Paul Ryan requested "Obamacare" funding.
www.thenation.com/blog/169757/exclusive-...cash?rel=emailNation

What's beautiful about our country is that one get to change their mind whenever they feel like it and especially if the price is right. I think most politicians are up for sale to the highest bidder

Ain't that the truth?

Now the PM of Israel is angry with Obama because Obama has plans on his agenda that does not allow time for him to meet with the PM.

Israel wants to strike Iran now and Obama would like to have a sit down meeting with Iran and other countries to inspect Iran to verify if the have arms of mass destruction.

Obama's health care package is to keep medicare without a voucher system. Thepeople of the USA need to focus on our country and not worry about others at this time. Israel is not here to vote, nor is Iran. It is Americans that vote and the other countries should see this and give us the respect for us to vote at this time.

your mixing up Ryans two jobs.........yes, one of his is to be republican VP nominee...and to lead the oppostion party against obamacare,......yet the other is to serve his constituency so he can ge re-elected to congress if he and romney dont win.....

obamacare is law.....and its still ryans job to make sure his district gets the benefits allowable under the current law.......politics aint easy or clean.......and the old saying is that politics makes strange bedfellows.

Sam wrote:
Israel wants to strike Iran now and Obama would like to have a sit down meeting with Iran and other countries to inspect Iran to verify if the have arms of mass destruction.

I've seen this scenario before Hmmmmm!!! and I remember the results !! The difference here is Iran admits to
possession of weapons of mass destruction. Iran not going to open the front doors and allow other countries to tour their state of the art facilities where arm of destruction made and stored.

Ryan's two jobs? His rhetoric does not match his actions.
If he was in line with his beliefs he would not have a facility built in his district with Affordable Health Care Act money or have it built at all for that matter. He could be at least be up front and explain his actions.
Whatever the rationalisation is, it's fair game for criticism in politics. IE he can be called a hypocrite, which he is.

I guess I can spell it out clearer for you....

Job #1
His rhetoric comes from his role as candidate for VP on the Republican ticket which opposes Obamacare....

Job #2
His actions come from his role as a Congressman attempting to get funds under the current law for his district....

Since we have a representitive democracy, it is incumbent on him to do whats best for his constituency, even if his own principles differ.....I dont know what you want, but I want a man elacted to an office who does whats best for us back home...Republican or Democrat...

I believe if he were to be upfront with his actions, he would say , you have to do whats best for your constituents back home or they will not re-elect you again....and lets be honest, nothing is more important to career politicians than getting re-elected....Republican, Democrat or independent......(which is why I support term limits.....)

I will agree with you that its fair game to criticize candidates in politics.....

American, British, French.........all politicians are chameleons - change to whatever political colour is prevalent at the time.